- Author: Amy Conrick
- Date: September 8, 2020
Downtown Renton, Washington’s Transit Center I have been reading several sources on the discussion of equity and public transportation recently,…
All across the United States, public transit systems are working to ensure that investments in transportation services are having a positive impact on their regional economies.
By further investing in and expanding their services, public transit providers can help create new jobs, provide clean energy transportation alternatives, and better address the socioeconomic inequalities within their existing systems. In order to make this a reality, however, it is critical that transit systems consider a host of factors beyond just the economic impact of their investments when working to improve their services.
In an August 26th webinar on “The Economic, Social, and Environmental Impacts of Transit Infrastructure on Regional Economies,” experts from Regional Economic Models Inc. (REMI) and statistical consulting firm KPMG discussed a joint project they recently conducted to better understand how transit systems can use federal funding to drive short-term economic growth and long-term transformative changes in their services.
Utilizing the REMI TranSight and the REMI Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion models—which have helped regional and national transit providers better understand how investments in their systems would lead to improvements in their services—REMI and KPMG analyzed three investment scenarios in the Washington Metropolitan Area to gain a better understanding of the various economic, social, and environmental impacts that can result from enhanced transit funding. These case studies included examining investments in bus electrification, fixed guideway transit, and improved bicycle infrastructure over a 10-year period.
The analysis of the three case studies included a focus on economic growth, equity and workforce development, and the environmental benefits of clean energy investments. The project found that each of the investment scenarios—based on the region’s existing infrastructure and previously proposed improvements to transit services—led to varying beneficial outcomes:
While the D.C. region was chosen for the project because of its size and diversity of transit services, this type of multi-step analysis of transit investments can help local, national, and state agencies—regardless of whether or not they are urban or rural—determine where to best spend their infrastructure funding.
“We see this type of analysis being potentially useful for policymakers and transit agencies to evaluate projects, which is especially important as federal agencies focus on a broader set of contributions when assessing and funding infrastructure projects,” Dr. Federico Garcia, a managing director at KPMG said.
Have more mobility news that we should be reading and sharing? Let us know! Reach out to Kirby Wilhelm (firstname.lastname@example.org).